Sweetwater Challenger 160 F  2001 boat specs
Sweetwater
Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001
2001
View full specs →
VS
Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3  2008 boat specs
Sweetwater
Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008
2008
View full specs →

Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 vs Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 vs Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 measures 23,0 feet overall (2008), giving it roughly 7,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 at 16,0 feet (2001). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 tips the scales at 179 lbs — 168 lbs less than the Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 at 11 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 tops out at 115 hp. Engine specs for the Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 carries 24 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 caps at 8. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 11 passengers and at 23,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 8 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeSweetwater
MakeSweetwater
ModelChallenger 160 F
ModelSW 2386 FS3
Model Year2001
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 0 in
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches102
Weight - Detail1100 lbs
Weight - Detail1,790 lbs
Weight - kg498.95
Weight - kg811.93
Weight - lbs.11
Weight - lbs.179
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet23
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail23 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters7.06
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches278
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches2
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter22 in
Tube diameter23 in
Number of tubesnot available
Number of tubes2
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standard50 hp Max
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail20 gal. - opt
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters75.71
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Gal2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Drive typeOutBoard
Drive typeOutboard
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Engine maxnot available
Engine max115 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1345 lbs
Maximum capacity1,618 lbs
Maximum people8
Maximum people11
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailOptional
Trailer - Detailnot available
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typenot available
Hull typePontoon

Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 vs Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 or the Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008?
The Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 is the longer of the two at 23,0 feet overall. The Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 7,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 or the Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008?
For trailering, the Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 has the edge at 11 lbs dry weight versus 179 lbs for the Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 has a documented max rating of 115 hp. Engine specifications for the Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 is certified for 11. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 measures 102" wide, compared to 96" for the Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 or the Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008?
The Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 has the bigger tank at 24 gallons, versus 2 gallons on the Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001. That 22-gallon difference translates to roughly 66–110 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 and Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Sweetwater Challenger 160 F 2001 and the Sweetwater SW 2386 FS3 2008 are built by Sweetwater. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.