The Sweetwater Challenger 160 EX 2005 vs Sweetwater SW 240 2011 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Sweetwater SW 240 2011 measures 26,0 feet overall (2011), giving it roughly 10,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Sweetwater Challenger 160 EX 2005 at 16,0 feet (2005). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Sweetwater SW 240 2011 tips the scales at 2 418 lbs — 1 273 lbs less than the Sweetwater Challenger 160 EX 2005 at 1 145 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Sweetwater SW 240 2011 has a 90-hp advantage over the Sweetwater Challenger 160 EX 2005's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Sweetwater SW 240 2011 carries 24 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Sweetwater Challenger 160 EX 2005. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Sweetwater SW 240 2011 is rated for 13 passengers, while the Sweetwater Challenger 160 EX 2005 caps at 9. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Sweetwater SW 240 2011 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Sweetwater SW 240 2011 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 13 passengers and at 26,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Sweetwater Challenger 160 EX 2005 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 9 that costs less to run day-to-day.