Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 boat specs
Sweetwater
Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES  2001 boat specs
Sweetwater
Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001
2001
View full specs →

Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 vs Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 vs Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 at 23,0 ft versus Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 at 22,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 tips the scales at 1 672 lbs — 1 503 lbs more than the Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 at 169 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 carries a rated maximum of 115 hp. Engine data for the Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 24 gal and 24 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 is rated for 13 passengers, while the Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 caps at 11. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 could be the deciding factor.

The Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 is an inflatable design — lighter, easier to store, and quicker to launch from a beach or dock without a slipway. The Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 is a rigid hull, which typically offers a more confident ride in chop and easier maintenance over the long term.

Bottom line: Choose the Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 13 passengers and at 22,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 11 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeSweetwater
MakeSweetwater
Model2386 RE-4 Gate
ModelChallenger 220 ES
Model Year2006
Model Year2001
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam8 ft. 0 in
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches96
Weight - Detail1,672 lbs
Weight - Detail1690 lbs
Weight - kg758.41
Weight - kg766.57
Weight - lbs.1672
Weight - lbs.169
Length - Feet23
Length - Feet22
Length overall - Detail23 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters7.01
Length overall - Meters6.71
Length overall - Inches276
Length overall - Inches264
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter23 in
Tube diameter22 in
Number of tubes2
Number of tubesnot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal. - opt
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutBoard
Engine max115 hp
Engine maxnot available
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standard60 hp Max
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,618 lbs
Maximum capacity1825 lbs
Maximum people11
Maximum people13
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailOptional

Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 vs Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 or the Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001?
The Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 is the longer of the two at 23,0 feet overall. The Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 comes in at 22,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 or the Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001?
For trailering, the Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 has the edge at 169 lbs dry weight versus 1 672 lbs for the Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 has a documented max rating of 115 hp. Engine specifications for the Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 11 passengers, while the Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 is certified for 13. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 measures 102" wide, compared to 96" for the Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 and Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 24 gallons and 24 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 and Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Sweetwater 2386 RE-4 Gate 2006 and the Sweetwater Challenger 220 ES 2001 are built by Sweetwater. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.