The Sundance B22 CX 2006 vs Sundance FX17 Flicker 2011 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Sundance B22 CX 2006 measures 21,0 feet overall (2006), giving it roughly 3,9 additional feet of deck space compared to the Sundance FX17 Flicker 2011 at 17,1 feet (2011). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Sundance B22 CX 2006 tips the scales at 1 745 lbs — 1 656 lbs more than the Sundance FX17 Flicker 2011 at 89 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Sundance B22 CX 2006 has a 80-hp advantage over the Sundance FX17 Flicker 2011's 70-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Sundance B22 CX 2006 carries 33 gallons versus 18 gallons in the Sundance FX17 Flicker 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Sundance B22 CX 2006 is rated for 14 passengers, while the Sundance FX17 Flicker 2011 caps at 3. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Sundance B22 CX 2006 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Sundance B22 CX 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 14 passengers and at 21,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Sundance FX17 Flicker 2011 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 3 that costs less to run day-to-day.