The Sundance 171 Bay 2006 vs Sundance B20CCR 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Sundance 171 Bay 2006 at 17,0 ft versus Sundance B20CCR 2013 at 19,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Sundance B20CCR 2013 tips the scales at 1 525 lbs — 1 376 lbs less than the Sundance 171 Bay 2006 at 149 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 130 hp, the Sundance B20CCR 2013 has a 40-hp advantage over the Sundance 171 Bay 2006's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Sundance 171 Bay 2006 carries 34 gallons versus 24 gallons in the Sundance B20CCR 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Sundance B20CCR 2013 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Sundance 171 Bay 2006 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Sundance B20CCR 2013 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Sundance B20CCR 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 19,8 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Sundance 171 Bay 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.