The Stingray 204LR 2013 vs Stingray 250CR 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Stingray 250CR 2006 measures 25,0 feet overall (2006), giving it roughly 4,6 additional feet of deck space compared to the Stingray 204LR 2013 at 20,4 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Stingray 250CR 2006 tips the scales at 4 137 lbs — 3 888 lbs less than the Stingray 204LR 2013 at 249 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Stingray 204LR 2013 carries a rated maximum of 150 hp. Engine data for the Stingray 250CR 2006 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Stingray 250CR 2006 carries 68 gallons versus 34 gallons in the Stingray 204LR 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Stingray 204LR 2013 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Stingray 250CR 2006 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Stingray 204LR 2013 could be the deciding factor.