The Stingray 191LX 2013 vs Stingray 220CS 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Stingray 191LX 2013 at 19,3 ft versus Stingray 220CS 2006 at 21,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Stingray 220CS 2006 tips the scales at 3 143 lbs — 3 122 lbs less than the Stingray 191LX 2013 at 21 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Stingray 191LX 2013 carries a rated maximum of 140 hp. Engine data for the Stingray 220CS 2006 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Stingray 220CS 2006 carries 38 gallons versus 34 gallons in the Stingray 191LX 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.