Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 boat specs
Stamas
Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas  2012 boat specs
Stamas
Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012
2012
View full specs →

Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 vs Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 against a deep vee Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012 measures 39,2 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 8,2 additional feet of deck space compared to the Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 at 31,0 feet (2007). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012 tips the scales at 16 975 lbs — 16 969 lbs less than the Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 at 6 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 caps at 9. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 11 passengers and at 39,2 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 9 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeStamas
MakeStamas
Model290 Tarpon Inboard
Model392 Aegean Inboard Gas
Model Year2007
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam10 ft. 4 in. (3.15 m)
Beam13 ft. 2 in. (4.01 m)
Beam - Meters3.15
Beam - Meters4.01
Beam - Inches124
Beam - Inches158
Bridge clearance - Detail6 ft. 10 in. w/o top
Bridge clearance - DetailWithout Top: 8 ft. 3 in. (2.51 m) With Standard Hardtop: 11 ft. 3 in. (3.44 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.08
Bridge clearance - Meters3.43
Bridge clearance - Inches82
Bridge clearance - Inches135
Draft [max] - Detail28 in. (0.71 m)
Draft [max] - Detail28 in. (0.71 m) (average)
Draft [max] - Meters0.71
Draft [max] - Meters0.71
Draft [max] - Inches28
Draft [max] - Inches28
Weight - Detail6,000 lbs. (2,718.68 kg)
Weight - Detail16,975 lbs. (7,689.68 kg)
Weight - kg2721.55
Weight - kg7699.72
Weight - lbs.6
Weight - lbs.16975
Length - Meters9.63
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet31
Length - Feet39.17
Length - Inches7
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detailw/Pulpit: 31 ft. 7 in. (9.63 m) w/o Pulpit: 29 ft. 3 in. (8.92 m)
Length overall - Detail39 ft. 2 in. (11.94 m)
Length overall - Meters9.63
Length overall - Meters11.94
Length overall - Inches379
Length overall - Inches47
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardw/Standard Gas Power: 320 hp (238 kW) w/Standard Diesel Power: 240 hp (179 kW)
Engine/s standard(2) 370 hp ((2) 276 kW)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail200 gal. (757 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail400 gal. (1,514 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters757.08
Fuel tank capacity - Liters1514.16
Fuel tank capacity - Gal2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal4
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeInboard
Drive typeInboard - Twin
Operational Info
Head1
Headnot available
Water capacity20 gal. (75.7 l)
Water capacity84 gal. (318 l)
Headroomnot available
Headroom6 ft. 4 in. (1.93 m)
Sleeping capacitynot available
Sleeping capacity6

Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 vs Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 or the Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012?
The Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012 is the longer of the two at 39,2 feet overall. The Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 comes in at 31,0 feet, making it roughly 8,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 or the Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012?
For trailering, the Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 has the edge at 6 lbs dry weight versus 16 975 lbs for the Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 9 passengers, while the Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012 is certified for 11. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012 measures 158" wide, compared to 124" for the Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 and Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 2 gallons and 4 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 and Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Stamas 290 Tarpon Inboard 2007 and the Stamas 392 Aegean Inboard Gas 2012 are built by Stamas. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.