The Skeeter FX 20 2013 vs Skeeter WX 1790T 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Skeeter FX 20 2013 measures 20,2 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 3,2 additional feet of deck space compared to the Skeeter WX 1790T 2006 at 17,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Skeeter FX 20 2013 tips the scales at 2 075 lbs — 2 062 lbs more than the Skeeter WX 1790T 2006 at 13 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 250 hp, the Skeeter FX 20 2013 has a 170-hp advantage over the Skeeter WX 1790T 2006's 80-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Skeeter WX 1790T 2006 carries 33 gallons versus 5 gallons in the Skeeter FX 20 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Skeeter WX 1790T 2006 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Skeeter FX 20 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Skeeter WX 1790T 2006 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Skeeter WX 1790T 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 17,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Skeeter FX 20 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.