SeaArk RX 180 2013 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk RX 180 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005
2005
View full specs →

SeaArk RX 180 2013 vs SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The SeaArk RX 180 2013 vs SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — SeaArk RX 180 2013 at 18,0 ft versus SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005 tips the scales at 475 lbs — 424 lbs less than the SeaArk RX 180 2013 at 51 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the SeaArk RX 180 2013 has a 40-hp advantage over the SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005 is rated for 6 passengers, while the SeaArk RX 180 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The SeaArk RX 180 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The SeaArk RX 180 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeSeaArk
MakeSeaArk
ModelRX 18
ModelSuper Jons 1660 MV
Model Year2013
Model Year2005
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam82 in
Beam82 in. (2.08 m)
Beam - Meters2.08
Beam - Meters2.08
Beam - Inches82
Beam - Inches82
Depth - Detail24 in
Depth - Detail24 in. (.61 m)
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Inches24
Depth - Inches24
Weight - Detail510 lbs
Weight - Detail475 lbs. (215.2 kg)
Weight - kg231.33
Weight - kg215.46
Weight - lbs.51
Weight - lbs.475
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 60 in
Width [transom] - Detail60 in. (1.52 m)
Length - Feet18
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail18 ft
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in. (4.88 m)
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches216
Length overall - Inches192
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]20 in. (.51 m)
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters4.88
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.100 in
Hull thickness.100 in. (2.54 mm)
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Engine max90 hp
Engine max50 hp (37.3 kw)
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity1,250 lbs. (566.4 kg)
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people6

SeaArk RX 180 2013 vs SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the SeaArk RX 180 2013 or the SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005?
The SeaArk RX 180 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the SeaArk RX 180 2013 or the SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005?
For trailering, the SeaArk RX 180 2013 has the edge at 51 lbs dry weight versus 475 lbs for the SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The SeaArk RX 180 2013 is rated to a maximum of 90 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005 tops out at 50 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The SeaArk RX 180 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The SeaArk RX 180 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 10 lbs per hp for the SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the SeaArk RX 180 2013 and SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005 share an 82 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Are the SeaArk RX 180 2013 and SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the SeaArk RX 180 2013 and the SeaArk Super Jons 1660 MV 2005 are built by SeaArk. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.