SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009
2009
View full specs →

SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 vs SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 vs SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009 measures 17,0 feet overall (2009), giving it roughly 15,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 at 2,0 feet (2007). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009 tips the scales at 755 lbs — 636 lbs less than the SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 at 119 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 140 hp, the SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 has a 65-hp advantage over the SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009's 75-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 is rated for 12 passengers, while the SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeSeaArk
MakeSeaArk
ModelRiverCat Classic (CC)
ModelX176 (SC)
Model Year2007
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam95 in
Beam84 in
Beam - Meters2.41
Beam - Meters2.13
Beam - Inches95
Beam - Inches84
Depth - Detail28 in
Depth - Detail24 in
Depth - Centimeters71.12
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Inches28
Depth - Inches24
Weight - Detail1,190 lbs
Weight - Detail755 lbs
Weight - kg539.77
Weight - kg342.46
Weight - lbs.119
Weight - lbs.755
Width [transom] - Detail72 in
Width [transom] - Detail60 in
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet17
Length - Inches1
Length - Inches6
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters6.12
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Inches241
Length overall - Inches21
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.125 in
Hull thickness0.1
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max140 hp
Engine max75 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity2,300 lbs
Maximum capacity1,300 lbs
Maximum people12
Maximum people5 / 740 lbs

SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 vs SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 or the SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009?
The SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 15,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 or the SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009?
For trailering, the SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 has the edge at 119 lbs dry weight versus 755 lbs for the SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 is rated to a maximum of 140 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009 tops out at 75 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 12 passengers, while the SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 10 lbs per hp for the SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 measures 95" wide, compared to 84" for the SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 and SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the SeaArk RiverCat Classic (CC) 2007 and the SeaArk X176 (SC) 2009 are built by SeaArk. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.