Matching a tunnel SeaArk Predator 220 FS 2013 against a modified vee SeaArk RiverCat CX200 (CC) 2008 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The SeaArk Predator 220 FS 2013 measures 22,5 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 20,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the SeaArk RiverCat CX200 (CC) 2008 at 2,0 feet (2008). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the SeaArk RiverCat CX200 (CC) 2008 tips the scales at 119 lbs — 103 lbs less than the SeaArk Predator 220 FS 2013 at 16 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the SeaArk Predator 220 FS 2013 has a 60-hp advantage over the SeaArk RiverCat CX200 (CC) 2008's 140-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The SeaArk RiverCat CX200 (CC) 2008 is rated for 12 passengers, while the SeaArk Predator 220 FS 2013 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the SeaArk RiverCat CX200 (CC) 2008 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the SeaArk RiverCat CX200 (CC) 2008 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The SeaArk Predator 220 FS 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.