Matching a tunnel SeaArk Predator 220 AK (CC) 2012 against a modified vee SeaArk RXV 186 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The SeaArk Predator 220 AK (CC) 2012 measures 22,5 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 4,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the SeaArk RXV 186 2013 at 18,5 feet (2013). At 16 lbs and 9 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the SeaArk Predator 220 AK (CC) 2012 has a 110-hp advantage over the SeaArk RXV 186 2013's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The SeaArk Predator 220 AK (CC) 2012 is rated for 6 passengers, while the SeaArk RXV 186 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the SeaArk Predator 220 AK (CC) 2012 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the SeaArk Predator 220 AK (CC) 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 22,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The SeaArk RXV 186 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.