Matching a modified vee SeaArk DuckHawk 2072SS 2008 against a flat SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 measures 18,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 16,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the SeaArk DuckHawk 2072SS 2008 at 2,0 feet (2008). At 81 lbs and 7 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the SeaArk DuckHawk 2072SS 2008 has a 40-hp advantage over the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The SeaArk DuckHawk 2072SS 2008 is rated for 13 passengers, while the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the SeaArk DuckHawk 2072SS 2008 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the SeaArk DuckHawk 2072SS 2008. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.