SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013
2013
View full specs →

SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 vs SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 against a flat SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 measures 18,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 16,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 at 2,0 feet (2009). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 tips the scales at 119 lbs — 112 lbs more than the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 at 7 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 140 hp, the SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 has a 90-hp advantage over the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 is rated for 12 passengers, while the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeSeaArk
MakeSeaArk
ModelCoastal 200 (SC)
ModelMud Runner 18
Model Year2009
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam95 in
Beam72 in
Beam - Meters2.41
Beam - Meters1.83
Beam - Inches95
Beam - Inches72
Depth - Detail28 in
Depth - Detail20 in
Depth - Centimeters71.12
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Inches28
Depth - Inches2
Weight - Detail1,190 lbs
Weight - Detail700 lbs
Weight - kg539.77
Weight - kg317.51
Weight - lbs.119
Weight - lbs.7
Width [transom] - Detail72 in
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 52 in
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet18
Length - Inches1
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft
Length overall - Meters6.12
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Inches241
Length overall - Inches216
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.125
Hull thickness0.125 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeFlat
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max140 hp
Engine max50 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity2,300 lbs
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people12 / 1,720 lbs
Maximum peoplenot available

SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 vs SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 or the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013?
The SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 16,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 or the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013?
For trailering, the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 has the edge at 7 lbs dry weight versus 119 lbs for the SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 is rated to a maximum of 140 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 tops out at 50 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 12 passengers, while the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 measures 95" wide, compared to 72" for the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 and SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the SeaArk Coastal 200 (SC) 2009 and the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 are built by SeaArk. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.