SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013
2013
View full specs →

SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 vs SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 vs SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 measures 18,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 16,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 at 2,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 tips the scales at 119 lbs — 112 lbs more than the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 at 7 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 140 hp, the SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 has a 90-hp advantage over the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 is rated for 12 passengers, while the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeSeaArk
MakeSeaArk
Model2072PCC Classic
ModelMud Runner 18
Model Year2006
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam95 in
Beam72 in
Beam - Meters2.41
Beam - Meters1.83
Beam - Inches95
Beam - Inches72
Depth - Detail26 in
Depth - Detail20 in
Depth - Centimeters66.04
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Inches26
Depth - Inches2
Weight - Detail1,190 lbs
Weight - Detail700 lbs
Weight - kg539.77
Weight - kg317.51
Weight - lbs.119
Weight - lbs.7
Width [transom] - Detail72 in
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 52 in
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet18
Length - Inches1
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft
Length overall - Meters6.12
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Inches241
Length overall - Inches216
Body / Hull
Hull thickness.125 in
Hull thickness0.125 in
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typenot available
Hull typeFlat
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max140 hp
Engine max50 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity2,300 lbs
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people12 people / 1,750 lbs
Maximum peoplenot available

SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 vs SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 or the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013?
The SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 16,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 or the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013?
For trailering, the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 has the edge at 7 lbs dry weight versus 119 lbs for the SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 is rated to a maximum of 140 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 tops out at 50 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 12 passengers, while the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 measures 95" wide, compared to 72" for the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 and SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the SeaArk 2072PCC Classic 2006 and the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 2013 are built by SeaArk. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.