SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008
2008
View full specs →

SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 vs SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a tunnel SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 against a modified vee SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 at 18,0 ft versus SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008 at 16,0 ft. At 515 lbs and 475 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 65 hp for the SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 and 50 hp for the SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008 is rated for 6 passengers, while the SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 comes in at 8 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeSeaArk
MakeSeaArk
Model1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro
ModelSuper Jon 1660MV
Model Year2013
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam84 in
Beam82 in
Beam - Meters2.13
Beam - Meters2.08
Beam - Inches84
Beam - Inches82
Depth - Detail24 in
Depth - Detail24 in
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Inches24
Depth - Inches24
Weight - Detail515 lbs
Weight - Detail475 lbs
Weight - kg233.6
Weight - kg215.46
Weight - lbs.515
Weight - lbs.475
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 60 in
Width [transom] - Detail60 in
Length - Feet18
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail18 ft
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches216
Length overall - Inches192
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]20 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.100 in
Hull thickness0.1
Hull typeTunnel
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Engine max65 hp
Engine max50 / 60 hp
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity1,250 lbs
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people6 / 745 lbs

SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 vs SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 or the SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008?
The SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 or the SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008?
For trailering, the SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008 has the edge at 475 lbs dry weight versus 515 lbs for the SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 is rated to a maximum of 65 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008 tops out at 50 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 8 lbs per hp compared to 10 lbs per hp for the SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 measures 84" wide, compared to 82" for the SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 and SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the SeaArk 1860JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 and the SeaArk Super Jon 1660MV 2008 are built by SeaArk. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.