The SeaArk 1660MVJT 2009 vs SeaArk Forecast 170C 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — SeaArk 1660MVJT 2009 at 16,0 ft versus SeaArk Forecast 170C 2007 at 17,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the SeaArk Forecast 170C 2007 tips the scales at 775 lbs — 300 lbs less than the SeaArk 1660MVJT 2009 at 475 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The SeaArk 1660MVJT 2009 carries a rated maximum of 60 hp. Engine data for the SeaArk Forecast 170C 2007 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The SeaArk 1660MVJT 2009 is rated for 6 passengers, while the SeaArk Forecast 170C 2007 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the SeaArk 1660MVJT 2009 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the SeaArk 1660MVJT 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The SeaArk Forecast 170C 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.