Matching a tunnel SeaArk 1660MVJT 2009 against a modified vee SeaArk DuckHawk 1872SS 2008 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — SeaArk 1660MVJT 2009 at 16,0 ft versus SeaArk DuckHawk 1872SS 2008 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the SeaArk 1660MVJT 2009 tips the scales at 475 lbs — 400 lbs more than the SeaArk DuckHawk 1872SS 2008 at 75 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 60 hp for the SeaArk 1660MVJT 2009 and 80 hp for the SeaArk DuckHawk 1872SS 2008. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The SeaArk DuckHawk 1872SS 2008 is rated for 11 passengers, while the SeaArk 1660MVJT 2009 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the SeaArk DuckHawk 1872SS 2008 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The SeaArk DuckHawk 1872SS 2008 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 8 lbs per hp for the SeaArk 1660MVJT 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.