The SeaArk 1660MV 2006 vs SeaArk DuckHawk 2072SS 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The SeaArk 1660MV 2006 measures 16,0 feet overall (2006), giving it roughly 14,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the SeaArk DuckHawk 2072SS 2013 at 2,0 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the SeaArk 1660MV 2006 tips the scales at 475 lbs — 394 lbs more than the SeaArk DuckHawk 2072SS 2013 at 81 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the SeaArk DuckHawk 2072SS 2013 has a 40-hp advantage over the SeaArk 1660MV 2006's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The SeaArk DuckHawk 2072SS 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the SeaArk 1660MV 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The SeaArk 1660MV 2006 at 16,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The SeaArk DuckHawk 2072SS 2013 at 2,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.