The SeaArk 1660 MVT 2005 vs SeaArk 2072 C.U.B. 2012 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The SeaArk 2072 C.U.B. 2012 measures 20,1 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 4,1 additional feet of deck space compared to the SeaArk 1660 MVT 2005 at 16,0 feet (2005). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the SeaArk 1660 MVT 2005 tips the scales at 475 lbs — 388 lbs more than the SeaArk 2072 C.U.B. 2012 at 87 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The SeaArk 1660 MVT 2005 carries a rated maximum of 50 hp. Engine data for the SeaArk 2072 C.U.B. 2012 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: The SeaArk 2072 C.U.B. 2012 at 20,1 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The SeaArk 1660 MVT 2005 at 16,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.