The SeaArk 1652PCC 2007 vs SeaArk DuckHawk 1872SS 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — SeaArk 1652PCC 2007 at 16,0 ft versus SeaArk DuckHawk 1872SS 2013 at 18,0 ft. At 52 lbs and 65 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 60 hp for the SeaArk 1652PCC 2007 and 80 hp for the SeaArk DuckHawk 1872SS 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The SeaArk DuckHawk 1872SS 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the SeaArk 1652PCC 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the SeaArk DuckHawk 1872SS 2013 and its 80-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the SeaArk 1652PCC 2007 with its 60-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.