SeaArk 1652MVT 2007 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk 1652MVT 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005
2005
View full specs →

SeaArk 1652MVT 2007 vs SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The SeaArk 1652MVT 2007 vs SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The SeaArk 1652MVT 2007 measures 16,0 feet overall (2007), giving it roughly 14,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 at 2,0 feet (2005). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the SeaArk 1652MVT 2007 tips the scales at 345 lbs — 226 lbs more than the SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 at 119 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 140 hp, the SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 has a 95-hp advantage over the SeaArk 1652MVT 2007's 45-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 is rated for 13 passengers, while the SeaArk 1652MVT 2007 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 8 lbs per hp for the SeaArk 1652MVT 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 13 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The SeaArk 1652MVT 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeSeaArk
MakeSeaArk
Model1652MVT
ModelBayrunner JT
Model Year2007
Model Year2005
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam72 in
Beam95 in. (2.41 m)
Beam - Meters1.83
Beam - Meters2.41
Beam - Inches72
Beam - Inches95
Depth - Detail20 in
Depth - Detail28 in. (.71 m)
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Centimeters71.12
Depth - Inches2
Depth - Inches28
Weight - Detail345 lbs
Weight - Detail1,190 lbs. (539.8 kg)
Weight - kg156.49
Weight - kg539.77
Weight - lbs.345
Weight - lbs.119
Width [transom] - Detail52 in
Width [transom] - Detail72 in. (1.83 m)
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet2
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 1 in. (6.12 m)
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters6.12
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches241
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Detail20 in. (.51 m)
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Meters0.51
Height - Inchesnot available
Height - Inches2
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters6.12
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches1
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull thickness0.100 in
Hull thickness.125 in. (3.17 mm)
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max45 hp
Engine max140 hp (104.5 kw)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs
Maximum capacity2,300 lbs. (143.3 kg)
Maximum people6
Maximum people13

SeaArk 1652MVT 2007 vs SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the SeaArk 1652MVT 2007 or the SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005?
The SeaArk 1652MVT 2007 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 14,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the SeaArk 1652MVT 2007 or the SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005?
For trailering, the SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 has the edge at 119 lbs dry weight versus 345 lbs for the SeaArk 1652MVT 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 is rated to a maximum of 140 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The SeaArk 1652MVT 2007 tops out at 45 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The SeaArk 1652MVT 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 is certified for 13. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 8 lbs per hp for the SeaArk 1652MVT 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 measures 95" wide, compared to 72" for the SeaArk 1652MVT 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the SeaArk 1652MVT 2007 and SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the SeaArk 1652MVT 2007 and the SeaArk Bayrunner JT 2005 are built by SeaArk. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.