SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk Stealth 172 2009
2009
View full specs →

SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013 vs SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a flat SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013 against a modified vee SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013 at 16,0 ft versus SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 at 17,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 tips the scales at 925 lbs — 570 lbs less than the SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013 at 355 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 100 hp, the SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 has a 75-hp advantage over the SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 comes in at 9 lbs per hp versus 14 lbs per hp for the SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 and its 100-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013 with its 25-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeSeaArk
MakeSeaArk
Model1648FN Flat Nose Jon
ModelStealth 172
Model Year2013
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam67 in
Beam77 in
Beam - Meters1.7
Beam - Meters1.96
Beam - Inches67
Beam - Inches77
Depth - Detail20 in
Depth - Detail22 in
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Centimeters55.88
Depth - Inches2
Depth - Inches22
Weight - Detail355 lbs
Weight - Detail925 lbs
Weight - kg161.03
Weight - kg419.57
Weight - lbs.355
Weight - lbs.925
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 48 in
Width [transom] - Detail56 in
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet17
Length overall - Detail16 ft
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters5.23
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches206
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches2
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.100 in
Hull thickness0.1
Hull typeFlat
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Engine max25 hp
Engine max100 hp
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail18 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters68.14
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal18
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity958 lbs
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people4 / 480 lbs

SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013 vs SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013 or the SeaArk Stealth 172 2009?
The SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013 or the SeaArk Stealth 172 2009?
For trailering, the SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013 has the edge at 355 lbs dry weight versus 925 lbs for the SeaArk Stealth 172 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 is rated to a maximum of 100 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 9 lbs per hp compared to 14 lbs per hp for the SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 measures 77" wide, compared to 67" for the SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013 and SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the SeaArk 1648FN Flat Nose Jon 2013 and the SeaArk Stealth 172 2009 are built by SeaArk. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.