SeaArk 1448MV 2006 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk 1448MV 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013
2013
View full specs →

SeaArk 1448MV 2006 vs SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The SeaArk 1448MV 2006 vs SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 measures 18,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 4,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the SeaArk 1448MV 2006 at 14,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the SeaArk 1448MV 2006 tips the scales at 305 lbs — 227 lbs more than the SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 at 78 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 80 hp, the SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 has a 50-hp advantage over the SeaArk 1448MV 2006's 30-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 is rated for 5 passengers, while the SeaArk 1448MV 2006 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the SeaArk 1448MV 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 18,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The SeaArk 1448MV 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeSeaArk
MakeSeaArk
Model1448MV
Model1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro
Model Year2006
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam67 in
Beam95 in
Beam - Meters1.7
Beam - Meters2.41
Beam - Inches67
Beam - Inches95
Depth - Detail20 in
Depth - Detail28 in
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Centimeters71.12
Depth - Inches2
Depth - Inches28
Weight - Detail305 lbs
Weight - Detail780 lbs
Weight - kg138.35
Weight - kg353.8
Weight - lbs.305
Weight - lbs.78
Width [transom] - Detail48 in
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 72 in
Height [transom]15 in. / 20 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet14
Length - Feet18
Length overall - Detail14 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft
Length overall - Meters4.27
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Inches168
Length overall - Inches216
Body / Hull
Hull thickness.100 in
Hull thickness0.125 in
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typenot available
Hull typeTunnel
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typenot available
Engine max30 hp
Engine max80 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity865 lbs
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people4 people / 550 lbs
Maximum peoplenot available

SeaArk 1448MV 2006 vs SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the SeaArk 1448MV 2006 or the SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013?
The SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The SeaArk 1448MV 2006 comes in at 14,0 feet, making it roughly 4,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the SeaArk 1448MV 2006 or the SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013?
For trailering, the SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 has the edge at 78 lbs dry weight versus 305 lbs for the SeaArk 1448MV 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 is rated to a maximum of 80 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The SeaArk 1448MV 2006 tops out at 30 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The SeaArk 1448MV 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 10 lbs per hp for the SeaArk 1448MV 2006. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 measures 95" wide, compared to 67" for the SeaArk 1448MV 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the SeaArk 1448MV 2006 and SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the SeaArk 1448MV 2006 and the SeaArk 1872JTPCC Jet Tunnel Pro 2013 are built by SeaArk. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.