SeaArk 1448FN 2010 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk 1448FN 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012 boat specs
SeaArk
SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012
2012
View full specs →

SeaArk 1448FN 2010 vs SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012 — A Close Look at Two Flats

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the SeaArk 1448FN 2010 and the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012 are flat designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — SeaArk 1448FN 2010 at 14,0 ft versus SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012 at 16,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012 tips the scales at 475 lbs — 443 lbs less than the SeaArk 1448FN 2010 at 32 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 25 hp for the SeaArk 1448FN 2010 and 45 hp for the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012 is rated for 5 passengers, while the SeaArk 1448FN 2010 caps at 3. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The SeaArk 1448FN 2010 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 11 lbs per hp for the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 16,8 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The SeaArk 1448FN 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 3 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeSeaArk
MakeSeaArk
Model1448FN
ModelMud Runner 17
Model Year201
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam67 in. (1.70 m)
Beam67 in
Beam - Meters1.7
Beam - Meters1.7
Beam - Inches67
Beam - Inches67
Depth - Detail20 in. (0.51 m)
Depth - Detail20 in
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Inches2
Depth - Inches2
Weight - Detail320 lbs. (145.2 kg)
Weight - Detail475 lbs
Weight - kg145.15
Weight - kg215.46
Weight - lbs.32
Weight - lbs.475
Width [transom] - Detail48 in. (1.22 m)
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 48 in
Height [transom]15 / 20 in. (0.38 / 0.51 m)
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet14
Length - Feet16.75
Length overall - Detail14 ft. 0 in. (4.27 m)
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Meters4.27
Length overall - Meters5.11
Length overall - Inches168
Length overall - Inches201
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.100 in. (2.54 mm)
Hull thickness0.125 in
Hull typeFlat
Hull typeFlat
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max25 hp (18.6 kW)
Engine max45 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity705 lbs. (319.9 kg)
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people3 / 380 lbs. (172.4 kg)
Maximum peoplenot available

SeaArk 1448FN 2010 vs SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the SeaArk 1448FN 2010 or the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012?
The SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012 is the longer of the two at 16,8 feet overall. The SeaArk 1448FN 2010 comes in at 14,0 feet, making it roughly 2,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the SeaArk 1448FN 2010 or the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012?
For trailering, the SeaArk 1448FN 2010 has the edge at 32 lbs dry weight versus 475 lbs for the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012 is rated to a maximum of 45 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The SeaArk 1448FN 2010 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The SeaArk 1448FN 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 3 passengers, while the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The SeaArk 1448FN 2010 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 11 lbs per hp for the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the SeaArk 1448FN 2010 and SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012 share an 67 in. (1.70 m) beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Are the SeaArk 1448FN 2010 and SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the SeaArk 1448FN 2010 and the SeaArk Mud Runner 170 2012 are built by SeaArk. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.