Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 boat specs
Sea Hunt
Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006 boat specs
Sea Hunt
Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006
2006
View full specs →

Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 vs Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 vs Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 measures 29,0 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 6,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006 at 23,0 feet (2006). At 56 lbs and 28 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 has a 50-hp advantage over the Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006's 250-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006 carries 103 gallons versus 24 gallons in the Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 at 29,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006 at 23,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
ModelGamefish 29
ModelTriton 232
Model Year2012
Model Year2006
MakeSea Hunt
MakeSea Hunt
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail29 ft
Length overall - Detail23 ft. 4 in
Length - Feet29
Length - Feet23
Length overall - Meters8.84
Length overall - Meters7.11
Length overall - Inches348
Length overall - Inches28
DeadriseTransom: 21° Midship: 24° Entry: 60°
Deadrise18℃
Draft [max] - Detail1 ft. 10 in
Draft [max] - Detail15 in
Weight - Detail5,600 lbs
Weight - Detail2,800 lbs
Beam - Meters2.95
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam9 ft. 8 in
Beam102 in
Beam - Inches116
Beam - Inches102
Weight - lbs.56
Weight - lbs.28
Weight - kg2540.12
Weight - kg1270.06
Draft [max] - Meters0.56
Draft [max] - Meters0.38
Draft [max] - Inches22
Draft [max] - Inches15
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail25 in. (cockpit)
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches25
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches4
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Fuel tank capacity - Gal103
Fuel tank capacity - Liters908.5
Fuel tank capacity - Liters389.9
Engine makeYamaha
Engine makenot available
Horsepower300 hp
Horsepowernot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Drive typeOutboard
Fuel tank capacity - Detail240 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail103 gal
Engine maxTwin 300 hp
Engine max250 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardYamaha
Operational Info
Water capacity19 gal
Water capacitynot available
Boat typePower
Boat typenot available
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity2,100 lbs
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people8

Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 vs Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 or the Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006?
The Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 is the longer of the two at 29,0 feet overall. The Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006 comes in at 23,0 feet, making it roughly 6,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 or the Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006?
For trailering, the Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006 has the edge at 28 lbs dry weight versus 56 lbs for the Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 is rated to a maximum of 300 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006 tops out at 250 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 measures 116" wide, compared to 102" for the Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 or the Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006?
The Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006 has the bigger tank at 103 gallons, versus 24 gallons on the Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012. That 79-gallon difference translates to roughly 237–395 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 and Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Sea Hunt Gamefish 29 2012 and the Sea Hunt Triton 232 2006 are built by Sea Hunt. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.