Scout 275 XSF  2012 boat specs
Scout
Scout 275 XSF 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 boat specs
Scout
Scout 282 Sportfish 2007
2007
View full specs →

Scout 275 XSF 2012 vs Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Scout 275 XSF 2012 vs Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Scout 275 XSF 2012 at 27,5 ft versus Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 at 28,0 ft. At 51 lbs and 51 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 600 hp, the Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 has a 100-hp advantage over the Scout 275 XSF 2012's 500-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 carries 205 gallons versus 175 gallons in the Scout 275 XSF 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 and its 600-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Scout 275 XSF 2012 with its 500-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeScout
MakeScout
Model275 XSF
Model282 Sportfish
Model Year2012
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam9 ft. (2.74 m)
Beam9 ft. 6 in
Beam - Meters2.74
Beam - Meters2.9
Beam - Inches108
Beam - Inches114
Bridge clearance - Detail9 ft. (2.74 m)
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.74
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches108
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Deadrise22°
Deadrise22℃
Draft [max] - Detail16 in. (0.4 m)
Draft [max] - Detail15 in
Draft [max] - Meters0.41
Draft [max] - Meters0.38
Draft [max] - Inches16
Draft [max] - Inches15
Weight - Detail5,100 lbs. (2,313 kg) without engines
Weight - Detail5,100 lbs
Weight - kg2313.32
Weight - kg2313.32
Weight - lbs.51
Weight - lbs.51
Length - Feet27.5
Length - Feet28
Length overall - Detail27 ft. 6 in. (8.38 m)
Length overall - Detail28 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Meters8.38
Length overall - Meters8.59
Length overall - Inches33
Length overall - Inches338
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches2
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialComposite
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail175 gal. (663 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail205 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters662.45
Fuel tank capacity - Liters776.01
Fuel tank capacity - Gal175
Fuel tank capacity - Gal205
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Engine max500 hp (373 kW)
Engine max600 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardYamaha
Operational Info
Headroom5 ft. 8 in. (1.72 m)
Headroomnot available
Water capacity15 gal. (57 l)
Water capacitynot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail9.5 gal. (36 l)
Holding tank capacity - DetailFresh: 20 gal
Holding tank capacity - Liters37.85
Holding tank capacity - Liters75.71
Holding tank capacity - Gal9.5
Holding tank capacity - Gal2
Headnot available
HeadSelf contained porcelain

Scout 275 XSF 2012 vs Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Scout 275 XSF 2012 or the Scout 282 Sportfish 2007?
The Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 is the longer of the two at 28,0 feet overall. The Scout 275 XSF 2012 comes in at 27,5 feet, making it roughly 0,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Scout 275 XSF 2012 or the Scout 282 Sportfish 2007?
For trailering, the Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 has the edge at 51 lbs dry weight versus 51 lbs for the Scout 275 XSF 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 is rated to a maximum of 600 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Scout 275 XSF 2012 tops out at 500 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Scout 275 XSF 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 measures 114" wide, compared to 108" for the Scout 275 XSF 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Scout 275 XSF 2012 or the Scout 282 Sportfish 2007?
The Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 has the bigger tank at 205 gallons, versus 175 gallons on the Scout 275 XSF 2012. That 30-gallon difference translates to roughly 90–150 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Scout 275 XSF 2012 and Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Scout 275 XSF 2012 and the Scout 282 Sportfish 2007 are built by Scout. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.