Scout 275 LXF  2013 boat specs
Scout
Scout 275 LXF 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Scout 345 XSF 2010 boat specs
Scout
Scout 345 XSF 2010
2010
View full specs →

Scout 275 LXF 2013 vs Scout 345 XSF 2010 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Scout 275 LXF 2013 against a modified vee Scout 345 XSF 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Scout 345 XSF 2010 measures 34,9 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 7,4 additional feet of deck space compared to the Scout 275 LXF 2013 at 27,5 feet (2013). At 51 lbs and 91 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 700 hp, the Scout 345 XSF 2010 has a 200-hp advantage over the Scout 275 LXF 2013's 500-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Scout 275 LXF 2013 carries 175 gallons versus 33 gallons in the Scout 345 XSF 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Scout 345 XSF 2010 is rated for 10 passengers, while the Scout 275 LXF 2013 caps at 8. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Scout 345 XSF 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Scout 345 XSF 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 10 passengers and at 34,9 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Scout 275 LXF 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 8 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeScout
MakeScout
Model275 LXF
Model345 XSF
Model Year2013
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam9 ft. (2.74 m)
Beam10 ft. 9 in
Beam - Meters2.74
Beam - Meters3.28
Beam - Inches108
Beam - Inches129
Bridge clearance - Detail9 ft. (2.74 m)
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.74
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches108
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Deadrise22°
Deadrise22°
Draft [max] - Detail16 in. (0.4 m)
Draft [max] - Detail27 in
Draft [max] - Meters0.41
Draft [max] - Meters0.69
Draft [max] - Inches16
Draft [max] - Inches27
Weight - Detail5,100 lbs. (2,313 kg) without engines
Weight - Detail9,100 lbs. without engines
Weight - kg2313.32
Weight - kg4127.69
Weight - lbs.51
Weight - lbs.91
Length - Feet27.5
Length - Feet34.92
Length overall - Detail27 ft. 6 in. (8.38 m)
Length overall - Detail34 ft. 11 in
Length overall - Meters8.38
Length overall - Meters10.64
Length overall - Inches33
Length overall - Inches419
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters10.6
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail175 gal. (663 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail330 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters662.45
Fuel tank capacity - Liters1249.19
Fuel tank capacity - Gal175
Fuel tank capacity - Gal33
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max500 hp (373 kW)
Engine max700 hp
Operational Info
Headroom5 ft. 8 in. (1.72 m)
Headroomnot available
Water capacity15 gal. (57 l)
Water capacity30 gal. (fresh)
Holding tank capacity - Detail9.5 gal. (36 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail10 gal
Holding tank capacity - Liters37.85
Holding tank capacity - Liters37.85
Holding tank capacity - Gal9.5
Holding tank capacity - Gal1

Scout 275 LXF 2013 vs Scout 345 XSF 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Scout 275 LXF 2013 or the Scout 345 XSF 2010?
The Scout 345 XSF 2010 is the longer of the two at 34,9 feet overall. The Scout 275 LXF 2013 comes in at 27,5 feet, making it roughly 7,4 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Scout 275 LXF 2013 or the Scout 345 XSF 2010?
For trailering, the Scout 275 LXF 2013 has the edge at 51 lbs dry weight versus 91 lbs for the Scout 345 XSF 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Scout 345 XSF 2010 is rated to a maximum of 700 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Scout 275 LXF 2013 tops out at 500 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Scout 275 LXF 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Scout 345 XSF 2010 is certified for 10. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Scout 345 XSF 2010 measures 129" wide, compared to 108" for the Scout 275 LXF 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Scout 275 LXF 2013 or the Scout 345 XSF 2010?
The Scout 275 LXF 2013 has the bigger tank at 175 gallons, versus 33 gallons on the Scout 345 XSF 2010. That 142-gallon difference translates to roughly 426–710 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Scout 275 LXF 2013 and Scout 345 XSF 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Scout 275 LXF 2013 and the Scout 345 XSF 2010 are built by Scout. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.