Scout 262 Abaco 2012 boat specs
Scout
Scout 262 Abaco 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Scout 345 XSF 2011 boat specs
Scout
Scout 345 XSF 2011
2011
View full specs →

Scout 262 Abaco 2012 vs Scout 345 XSF 2011 — Which Deep Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Scout 262 Abaco 2012 and the Scout 345 XSF 2011 are deep vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Scout 345 XSF 2011 measures 34,9 feet overall (2011), giving it roughly 8,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Scout 262 Abaco 2012 at 26,2 feet (2012). At 48 lbs and 108 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 700 hp, the Scout 345 XSF 2011 has a 400-hp advantage over the Scout 262 Abaco 2012's 300-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Scout 345 XSF 2011 carries 33 gallons versus 13 gallons in the Scout 262 Abaco 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Scout 345 XSF 2011 is rated for 10 passengers, while the Scout 262 Abaco 2012 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Scout 345 XSF 2011 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Scout 345 XSF 2011 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 10 passengers and at 34,9 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Scout 262 Abaco 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeScout
MakeScout
Model262 Abaco
Model345 XSF
Model Year2012
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 10 in. (2.7 m)
Beam10 ft. 9 in. (3.2 m)
Beam - Meters2.69
Beam - Meters3.28
Beam - Inches106
Beam - Inches129
Deadrise21℃
Deadrise22°
Draft [max] - Detail15 in. (0.4 m)
Draft [max] - Detail27 in. (0.69 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.38
Draft [max] - Meters0.69
Draft [max] - Inches15
Draft [max] - Inches27
Weight - Detail4,800 lbs. (2,177 kg) without engines
Weight - Detail9,100 lbs. (4,128 kg) without engines 10,800 lbs. (4,899 kg) with twin 350's
Weight - kg2177.24
Weight - kg4898.79
Weight - lbs.48
Weight - lbs.108
Length - Feet26.17
Length - Feet34.92
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 2 in. (7.98 m)
Length overall - Detail34 ft. 11 in. (10.6 m)
Length overall - Meters7.98
Length overall - Meters10.64
Length overall - Inches314
Length overall - Inches419
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail130 gal. (492 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail330 gal. (1,249 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters492.1
Fuel tank capacity - Liters1249.19
Fuel tank capacity - Gal13
Fuel tank capacity - Gal33
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Engine max300 hp (224 kW)
Engine max700 hp (522 kw)
Operational Info
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity30 gal. (113.5 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail10 gal. (37.8 l)
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters37.85
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal1

Scout 262 Abaco 2012 vs Scout 345 XSF 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Scout 262 Abaco 2012 or the Scout 345 XSF 2011?
The Scout 345 XSF 2011 is the longer of the two at 34,9 feet overall. The Scout 262 Abaco 2012 comes in at 26,2 feet, making it roughly 8,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Scout 262 Abaco 2012 or the Scout 345 XSF 2011?
For trailering, the Scout 262 Abaco 2012 has the edge at 48 lbs dry weight versus 108 lbs for the Scout 345 XSF 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Scout 345 XSF 2011 is rated to a maximum of 700 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Scout 262 Abaco 2012 tops out at 300 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Scout 262 Abaco 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Scout 345 XSF 2011 is certified for 10. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Scout 345 XSF 2011 measures 129" wide, compared to 106" for the Scout 262 Abaco 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Scout 262 Abaco 2012 or the Scout 345 XSF 2011?
The Scout 345 XSF 2011 has the bigger tank at 33 gallons, versus 13 gallons on the Scout 262 Abaco 2012. That 20-gallon difference translates to roughly 60–100 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Scout 262 Abaco 2012 and Scout 345 XSF 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Scout 262 Abaco 2012 and the Scout 345 XSF 2011 are built by Scout. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.