The Scout 262 Abaco 2012 is a deep-V design and the Scout 262 XSF 2010 is a modified-V design, so you're likely deciding between two noticeably different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Scout 262 Abaco 2012 at 26,2 ft versus Scout 262 XSF 2010 at 26,2 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Scout 262 Abaco 2012 tips the scales at 4 800 lbs - 900 lbs more than the Scout 262 XSF 2010 at 3 900 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 350 hp, the Scout 262 XSF 2010 has a 50-hp advantage over the Scout 262 Abaco 2012's 300-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Scout 262 XSF 2010 carries 145 gallons versus 130 gallons in the Scout 262 Abaco 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 7 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Scout 262 XSF 2010 and its 350-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Scout 262 Abaco 2012 with its 300-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.