Scout 262 Abaco 2007 boat specs
Scout
Scout 262 Abaco 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Scout 275 LXF  2013 boat specs
Scout
Scout 275 LXF 2013
2013
View full specs →

Scout 262 Abaco 2007 vs Scout 275 LXF 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Scout 262 Abaco 2007 vs Scout 275 LXF 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Scout 262 Abaco 2007 at 26,0 ft versus Scout 275 LXF 2013 at 27,5 ft. At 42 lbs and 51 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 500 hp, the Scout 275 LXF 2013 has a 200-hp advantage over the Scout 262 Abaco 2007's 300-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Scout 275 LXF 2013 carries 175 gallons versus 13 gallons in the Scout 262 Abaco 2007. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Scout 275 LXF 2013 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Scout 262 Abaco 2007 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Scout 275 LXF 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Scout 275 LXF 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 27,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Scout 262 Abaco 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeScout
MakeScout
Model262 Abaco
Model275 LXF
Model Year2007
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 10 in
Beam9 ft. (2.74 m)
Beam - Meters2.69
Beam - Meters2.74
Beam - Inches106
Beam - Inches108
Deadrise21℃
Deadrise22°
Draft [max] - Detail15 in
Draft [max] - Detail16 in. (0.4 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.38
Draft [max] - Meters0.41
Draft [max] - Inches15
Draft [max] - Inches16
Weight - Detail4,200 lbs
Weight - Detail5,100 lbs. (2,313 kg) without engines
Weight - kg1905.09
Weight - kg2313.32
Weight - lbs.42
Weight - lbs.51
Length - Feet26
Length - Feet27.5
Length - Inches2
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Detail27 ft. 6 in. (8.38 m)
Length overall - Meters7.98
Length overall - Meters8.38
Length overall - Inches314
Length overall - Inches33
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Detail9 ft. (2.74 m)
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.74
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches108
Body / Hull
Hull materialComposite
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardYamaha
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail130 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail175 gal. (663 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters492.1
Fuel tank capacity - Liters662.45
Fuel tank capacity - Gal13
Fuel tank capacity - Gal175
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Engine max300 hp
Engine max500 hp (373 kW)
Operational Info
HeadChina bowl toilet
Headnot available
Water capacityFresh: 6 gal
Water capacity15 gal. (57 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail6 gal
Holding tank capacity - Detail9.5 gal. (36 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters22.71
Holding tank capacity - Liters37.85
Holding tank capacity - Gal6
Holding tank capacity - Gal9.5
Headroomnot available
Headroom5 ft. 8 in. (1.72 m)

Scout 262 Abaco 2007 vs Scout 275 LXF 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Scout 262 Abaco 2007 or the Scout 275 LXF 2013?
The Scout 275 LXF 2013 is the longer of the two at 27,5 feet overall. The Scout 262 Abaco 2007 comes in at 26,0 feet, making it roughly 1,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Scout 262 Abaco 2007 or the Scout 275 LXF 2013?
For trailering, the Scout 262 Abaco 2007 has the edge at 42 lbs dry weight versus 51 lbs for the Scout 275 LXF 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Scout 275 LXF 2013 is rated to a maximum of 500 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Scout 262 Abaco 2007 tops out at 300 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Scout 262 Abaco 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Scout 275 LXF 2013 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Scout 275 LXF 2013 measures 108" wide, compared to 106" for the Scout 262 Abaco 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Scout 262 Abaco 2007 or the Scout 275 LXF 2013?
The Scout 275 LXF 2013 has the bigger tank at 175 gallons, versus 13 gallons on the Scout 262 Abaco 2007. That 162-gallon difference translates to roughly 486–810 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Scout 262 Abaco 2007 and Scout 275 LXF 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Scout 262 Abaco 2007 and the Scout 275 LXF 2013 are built by Scout. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.