Scout 245 XSF 2012 boat specs
Scout
Scout 245 XSF 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Scout 345 XSF 2012 boat specs
Scout
Scout 345 XSF 2012
2012
View full specs →

Scout 245 XSF 2012 vs Scout 345 XSF 2012: Which Deep-V Boat Fits Your Needs?

Both the Scout 245 XSF 2012 and the Scout 345 XSF 2012 are deep-V designs, both built in fibreglass, so the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Scout 345 XSF 2012 measures 34,9 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 10,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Scout 245 XSF 2012 at 24,4 feet (2012). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Scout 345 XSF 2012 tips the scales at 10 800 lbs - 8 200 lbs less than the Scout 245 XSF 2012 at 2 600 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 700 hp, the Scout 345 XSF 2012 has a 400-hp advantage over the Scout 245 XSF 2012's 300-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Scout 345 XSF 2012 carries 330 gallons versus 125 gallons in the Scout 245 XSF 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 10 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Scout 345 XSF 2012 at 34,9 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Scout 245 XSF 2012 at 24,4 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking - a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeScout
MakeScout
Model245 XSF
Model345 XSF
Model Year2012
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.6 m)
Beam10 ft. 9 in. (3.2 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters3.28
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches129
Deadrise20°
Deadrise22°
Draft [max] - Detail17 in. (0.4 m)
Draft [max] - Detail27 in. (0.69 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.43
Draft [max] - Meters0.69
Draft [max] - Inches17
Draft [max] - Inches27
Weight - Detail2,600 lbs. (1,179 kg) without engines
Weight - Detail9,100 lbs. (4,128 kg) without engines 10,800 lbs. (4,899 kg) with twin 350's
Weight - kg1179.34
Weight - kg4898.79
Weight - lbs.2600
Weight - lbs.10800
Length - Feet24.42
Length - Feet34.92
Length overall - Detail24 ft. 5 in. (7.4 m)
Length overall - Detail34 ft. 11 in. (10.6 m)
Length overall - Meters7.44
Length overall - Meters10.64
Length overall - Inches293
Length overall - Inches419
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail125 gal. (473 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail330 gal. (1,249 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters473.18
Fuel tank capacity - Liters1249.19
Fuel tank capacity - Gal125
Fuel tank capacity - Gal330
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Horsepower250 hp (187 kW)
Horsepowernot available
Engine max300 hp (224 kW)
Engine max700 hp (522 kw)
Operational Info
Water capacity15 gal. (57 l)
Water capacity30 gal. (113.5 l)
Maximum people10
Maximum peoplenot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail10 gal. (38 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail10 gal. (37.8 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters37.85
Holding tank capacity - Liters37.85
Holding tank capacity - Gal10
Holding tank capacity - Gal10

Scout 245 XSF 2012 vs Scout 345 XSF 2012 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Scout 245 XSF 2012 or the Scout 345 XSF 2012?
The Scout 345 XSF 2012 is the longer of the two at 34,9 feet overall. The Scout 245 XSF 2012 comes in at 24,4 feet, making it roughly 10,5 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Scout 245 XSF 2012 or the Scout 345 XSF 2012?
For trailering, the Scout 245 XSF 2012 has the edge at 2 600 lbs dry weight versus 10 800 lbs for the Scout 345 XSF 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Scout 345 XSF 2012 is rated to a maximum of 700 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Scout 245 XSF 2012 tops out at 300 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that - matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Scout 245 XSF 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 10 passengers, while the Scout 345 XSF 2012 is certified for 10. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing - on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Scout 345 XSF 2012 measures 129" wide, compared to 102" for the Scout 245 XSF 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states - anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank - the Scout 245 XSF 2012 or the Scout 345 XSF 2012?
The Scout 345 XSF 2012 has the bigger tank at 330 gallons, versus 125 gallons on the Scout 245 XSF 2012. That 205-gallon difference translates to roughly 615–1025 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Scout 245 XSF 2012 and Scout 345 XSF 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Scout 245 XSF 2012 and the Scout 345 XSF 2012 are built by Scout. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.