Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 boat specs
Scout
Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Scout 245 XSF 2013 boat specs
Scout
Scout 245 XSF 2013
2013
View full specs →

Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 vs Scout 245 XSF 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 against a deep vee Scout 245 XSF 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 at 23,8 ft versus Scout 245 XSF 2013 at 24,4 ft. At 22 lbs and 26 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 300 hp for the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 and 300 hp for the Scout 245 XSF 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Scout 245 XSF 2013 carries 125 gallons versus 85 gallons in the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Scout 245 XSF 2013 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 23,8 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Scout 245 XSF 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 1 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeScout
MakeScout
Model240 Bay Scout
Model245 XSF
Model Year201
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.6 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise16℃
Deadrise20°
Draft [max] - Detail13 in
Draft [max] - Detail17 in. (0.4 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.33
Draft [max] - Meters0.43
Draft [max] - Inches13
Draft [max] - Inches17
Weight - Detail2,200 lbs. without engines
Weight - Detail2,600 lbs. (1,179 kg) without engines
Weight - kg997.9
Weight - kg1179.34
Weight - lbs.22
Weight - lbs.26
Length - Feet23.83
Length - Feet24.42
Length overall - Detail23 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Detail24 ft. 5 in. (7.4 m)
Length overall - Meters7.26
Length overall - Meters7.44
Length overall - Inches286
Length overall - Inches293
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Detail6 ft. 3 in. With T-top / Hardtop: 8 ft. 8 in. (2.6 m) With T-top / Hardtop & Outriggers: 9 ft. 5 in. (2.9 m)
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.87
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches113
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail85 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail125 gal. (473 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters321.76
Fuel tank capacity - Liters473.18
Fuel tank capacity - Gal85
Fuel tank capacity - Gal125
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max300 hp
Engine max300 hp (224 kW)
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower250 hp (187 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum people8
Maximum people1
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity15 gal. (57 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail10 gal. (38 l)
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters37.85
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal1

Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 vs Scout 245 XSF 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 or the Scout 245 XSF 2013?
The Scout 245 XSF 2013 is the longer of the two at 24,4 feet overall. The Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 comes in at 23,8 feet, making it roughly 0,6 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 or the Scout 245 XSF 2013?
For trailering, the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 has the edge at 22 lbs dry weight versus 26 lbs for the Scout 245 XSF 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Scout 245 XSF 2013 is certified for 1. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 and Scout 245 XSF 2013 share an 8 ft. 6 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 or the Scout 245 XSF 2013?
The Scout 245 XSF 2013 has the bigger tank at 125 gallons, versus 85 gallons on the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010. That 40-gallon difference translates to roughly 120–200 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 and Scout 245 XSF 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2010 and the Scout 245 XSF 2013 are built by Scout. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.