Scout 210 Dorado 2013 boat specs
Scout
Scout 210 Dorado 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Scout 282 XSF 2011 boat specs
Scout
Scout 282 XSF 2011
2011
View full specs →

Scout 210 Dorado 2013 vs Scout 282 XSF 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Scout 210 Dorado 2013 against a deep vee Scout 282 XSF 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Scout 282 XSF 2011 measures 28,2 feet overall (2011), giving it roughly 7,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Scout 210 Dorado 2013 at 20,8 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Scout 210 Dorado 2013 tips the scales at 204 lbs — 155 lbs more than the Scout 282 XSF 2011 at 49 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 600 hp, the Scout 282 XSF 2011 has a 400-hp advantage over the Scout 210 Dorado 2013's 200-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Scout 282 XSF 2011 carries 205 gallons versus 6 gallons in the Scout 210 Dorado 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Scout 282 XSF 2011 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Scout 210 Dorado 2013 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Scout 282 XSF 2011 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Scout 282 XSF 2011 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 28,2 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Scout 210 Dorado 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeScout
MakeScout
Model210 Dorado
Model282 XSF
Model Year2013
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 4 in. (2.5 m)
Beam9 ft. 6 in. (2.9 m)
Beam - Meters2.54
Beam - Meters2.9
Beam - Inches1
Beam - Inches114
Bridge clearance - Detail4 ft. 10 in. (1.5 m)
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters1.47
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches58
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Deadrise19°
Deadrise22℃
Draft [max] - Detail15 in. (0.4 m)
Draft [max] - Detail15 in. (0.4 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.38
Draft [max] - Meters0.38
Draft [max] - Inches15
Draft [max] - Inches15
Weight - Detail2,040 lbs. (925 kg) without engines
Weight - Detail4,900 lbs. (2,223 kg) without engines
Weight - kg925.33
Weight - kg2222.6
Weight - lbs.204
Weight - lbs.49
Length - Feet20.83
Length - Feet28.17
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 10 in. (6.35 m)
Length overall - Detail28 ft. 2 in. (8.6 m)
Length overall - Meters6.35
Length overall - Meters8.59
Length overall - Inches25
Length overall - Inches338
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail60 gal. (227 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail205 gal. (776 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters227.12
Fuel tank capacity - Liters776.01
Fuel tank capacity - Gal6
Fuel tank capacity - Gal205
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Horsepower150 hp (112 kW)
Horsepower500 hp (373 kW)
Engine max200 hp (149 kW)
Engine max600 hp (448 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum people7
Maximum peoplenot available

Scout 210 Dorado 2013 vs Scout 282 XSF 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Scout 210 Dorado 2013 or the Scout 282 XSF 2011?
The Scout 282 XSF 2011 is the longer of the two at 28,2 feet overall. The Scout 210 Dorado 2013 comes in at 20,8 feet, making it roughly 7,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Scout 210 Dorado 2013 or the Scout 282 XSF 2011?
For trailering, the Scout 282 XSF 2011 has the edge at 49 lbs dry weight versus 204 lbs for the Scout 210 Dorado 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Scout 282 XSF 2011 is rated to a maximum of 600 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Scout 210 Dorado 2013 tops out at 200 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Scout 210 Dorado 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Scout 282 XSF 2011 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Scout 282 XSF 2011 measures 114" wide, compared to 1" for the Scout 210 Dorado 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Scout 210 Dorado 2013 or the Scout 282 XSF 2011?
The Scout 282 XSF 2011 has the bigger tank at 205 gallons, versus 6 gallons on the Scout 210 Dorado 2013. That 199-gallon difference translates to roughly 597–995 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Scout 210 Dorado 2013 and Scout 282 XSF 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Scout 210 Dorado 2013 and the Scout 282 XSF 2011 are built by Scout. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.