Scout 195 SF 2013 boat specs
Scout
Scout 195 SF 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 boat specs
Scout
Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008
2008
View full specs →

Scout 195 SF 2013 vs Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Scout 195 SF 2013 against a modified vee Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 measures 23,0 feet overall (2008), giving it roughly 3,6 additional feet of deck space compared to the Scout 195 SF 2013 at 19,4 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Scout 195 SF 2013 tips the scales at 215 lbs — 193 lbs more than the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 at 22 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 has a 50-hp advantage over the Scout 195 SF 2013's 150-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 carries 85 gallons versus 5 gallons in the Scout 195 SF 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Scout 195 SF 2013 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 23,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Scout 195 SF 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeScout
MakeScout
Model195 SF
Model240 Bay Scout
Model Year2013
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.6 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise19°
Deadrise16℃
Draft [max] - Detail13 in. (0.33 m)
Draft [max] - Detail11 in
Draft [max] - Meters0.33
Draft [max] - Meters0.28
Draft [max] - Inches13
Draft [max] - Inches11
Weight - Detail2,150 lbs. (975 kg) without engines
Weight - Detail2,200 lbs. (without engines)
Weight - kg975.22
Weight - kg997.9
Weight - lbs.215
Weight - lbs.22
Length - Feet19.42
Length - Feet23
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 42 in. (5.92 m)
Length overall - Detail23 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Meters6.86
Length overall - Meters7.26
Length overall - Inches27
Length overall - Inches286
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches1
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail50 gal. (189 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail85 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters189.27
Fuel tank capacity - Liters321.76
Fuel tank capacity - Gal5
Fuel tank capacity - Gal85
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower115 hp (86 kW)
Horsepowernot available
Engine max150 hp (112 kW)
Engine maxRecommended: 200 / 225 hp Maximum: 300 hp
Operational Info
Maximum people7
Maximum people8

Scout 195 SF 2013 vs Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Scout 195 SF 2013 or the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008?
The Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 is the longer of the two at 23,0 feet overall. The Scout 195 SF 2013 comes in at 19,4 feet, making it roughly 3,6 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Scout 195 SF 2013 or the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008?
For trailering, the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 has the edge at 22 lbs dry weight versus 215 lbs for the Scout 195 SF 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 is rated to a maximum of 200 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Scout 195 SF 2013 tops out at 150 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Scout 195 SF 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Scout 195 SF 2013 and Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 share an 8 ft. 6 in. (2.6 m) beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Scout 195 SF 2013 or the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008?
The Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 has the bigger tank at 85 gallons, versus 5 gallons on the Scout 195 SF 2013. That 80-gallon difference translates to roughly 240–400 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Scout 195 SF 2013 and Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Scout 195 SF 2013 and the Scout 240 Bay Scout 2008 are built by Scout. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.