The Scout 191 Bay Scout 2013 is a modified-V design and the Scout 295 Abaco 2010 is a deep-V design, so you're likely deciding between two noticeably different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Scout 295 Abaco 2010 measures 30,8 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 12,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Scout 191 Bay Scout 2013 at 18,8 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Scout 295 Abaco 2010 tips the scales at 9 500 lbs - 8 200 lbs less than the Scout 191 Bay Scout 2013 at 1 300 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 600 hp, the Scout 295 Abaco 2010 has a 450-hp advantage over the Scout 191 Bay Scout 2013's 150-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Scout 295 Abaco 2010 carries 200 gallons versus 42 gallons in the Scout 191 Bay Scout 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Scout 295 Abaco 2010 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Scout 191 Bay Scout 2013 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Scout 295 Abaco 2010 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Scout 295 Abaco 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water - it handles 9 passengers and at 30,8 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Scout 191 Bay Scout 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.