The Scout 190 Costa 2009 vs Scout 220 Bay Scout 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Scout 190 Costa 2009 at 19,0 ft versus Scout 220 Bay Scout 2007 at 21,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Scout 220 Bay Scout 2007 tips the scales at 185 lbs — 172 lbs less than the Scout 190 Costa 2009 at 13 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Scout 190 Costa 2009 has a 75-hp advantage over the Scout 220 Bay Scout 2007's 150-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Scout 220 Bay Scout 2007 carries 65 gallons versus 45 gallons in the Scout 190 Costa 2009. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Scout 190 Costa 2009 and its 225-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Scout 220 Bay Scout 2007 with its 150-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.