Scout 190 Costa 2009 boat specs
Scout
Scout 190 Costa 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013 boat specs
Scout
Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013
2013
View full specs →

Scout 190 Costa 2009 vs Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Scout 190 Costa 2009 and the Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Scout 190 Costa 2009 at 19,0 ft versus Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013 at 19,8 ft. At 13 lbs and 16 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Scout 190 Costa 2009 has a 25-hp advantage over the Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013's 200-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013 carries 58 gallons versus 45 gallons in the Scout 190 Costa 2009. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Scout 190 Costa 2009 and its 225-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013 with its 200-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeScout
MakeScout
Model190 Costa
Model201 Bay Scout
Model Year2009
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.6 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise10℃
Deadrise18°
Draft [max] - Detail10 in
Draft [max] - Detail10 in. (0.25 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.25
Draft [max] - Meters0.25
Draft [max] - Inches1
Draft [max] - Inches1
Weight - Detail1,300 lbs. without engine
Weight - Detail1,600 lbs. (726 kg) without engines
Weight - kg589.67
Weight - kg725.75
Weight - lbs.13
Weight - lbs.16
Length - Feet19
Length - Feet19.83
Length - Inches5
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 10 in. (6 m)
Length overall - Meters5.92
Length overall - Meters6.05
Length overall - Inches233
Length overall - Inches238
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Detail4 ft. 8 in. (1.4 m) With T-top / Hardtop: 7 ft. 9 in. (2.4 m)
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.36
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches93
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail45 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail58 gal. (220 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters170.34
Fuel tank capacity - Liters219.55
Fuel tank capacity - Gal45
Fuel tank capacity - Gal58
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max225 hp
Engine max200 hp (149 kW)
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower115 - 150 hp (86 - 112 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum people6
Maximum people6

Scout 190 Costa 2009 vs Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Scout 190 Costa 2009 or the Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013?
The Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013 is the longer of the two at 19,8 feet overall. The Scout 190 Costa 2009 comes in at 19,0 feet, making it roughly 0,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Scout 190 Costa 2009 or the Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013?
For trailering, the Scout 190 Costa 2009 has the edge at 13 lbs dry weight versus 16 lbs for the Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Scout 190 Costa 2009 is rated to a maximum of 225 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013 tops out at 200 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Scout 190 Costa 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Scout 190 Costa 2009 and Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013 share an 8 ft. 6 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Scout 190 Costa 2009 or the Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013?
The Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013 has the bigger tank at 58 gallons, versus 45 gallons on the Scout 190 Costa 2009. That 13-gallon difference translates to roughly 39–65 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Scout 190 Costa 2009 and Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Scout 190 Costa 2009 and the Scout 201 Bay Scout 2013 are built by Scout. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.