Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 boat specs
Scout
Scout 175 Sportfish 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Scout 210 XSF 2013 boat specs
Scout
Scout 210 XSF 2013
2013
View full specs →

Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 vs Scout 210 XSF 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 against a deep vee Scout 210 XSF 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Scout 210 XSF 2013 measures 20,8 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 3,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 at 17,0 feet (2009). At 126 lbs and 198 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 220 hp, the Scout 210 XSF 2013 has a 105-hp advantage over the Scout 175 Sportfish 2009's 115-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Scout 210 XSF 2013 carries 65 gallons versus 32 gallons in the Scout 175 Sportfish 2009. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Scout 210 XSF 2013 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Scout 210 XSF 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Scout 210 XSF 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 20,8 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeScout
MakeScout
Model175 Sportfish
Model210 XSF
Model Year2009
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 5 in
Beam8 ft. 4 in. (2.5 m)
Beam - Meters2.26
Beam - Meters2.54
Beam - Inches89
Beam - Inches1
Deadrise13℃
Deadrise19°
Draft [max] - Detail10 in
Draft [max] - Detail15 in. (0.4 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.25
Draft [max] - Meters0.38
Draft [max] - Inches1
Draft [max] - Inches15
Weight - Detail1,260 lbs. without engine
Weight - Detail1,980 lbs. (898 kg) without engines
Weight - kg571.53
Weight - kg898.11
Weight - lbs.126
Weight - lbs.198
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet20.83
Length - Inches5
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 10 in. (6.35 m)
Length overall - Meters5.31
Length overall - Meters6.35
Length overall - Inches209
Length overall - Inches25
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Detail6 ft. 2 in. (1.9 m) With T-top / Hardtop: 8 ft. 5 in. (2.6 m) With T-top / Hardtop & Outriggers: 9 ft. 2 in. (2.8 m)
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.79
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches11
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail32 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail65 gal. (246 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters121.13
Fuel tank capacity - Liters246.05
Fuel tank capacity - Gal32
Fuel tank capacity - Gal65
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max115 hp
Engine max220 hp (149 kW)
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower150 hp (112 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum people6
Maximum people7

Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 vs Scout 210 XSF 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 or the Scout 210 XSF 2013?
The Scout 210 XSF 2013 is the longer of the two at 20,8 feet overall. The Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 3,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 or the Scout 210 XSF 2013?
For trailering, the Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 has the edge at 126 lbs dry weight versus 198 lbs for the Scout 210 XSF 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Scout 210 XSF 2013 is rated to a maximum of 220 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 tops out at 115 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Scout 210 XSF 2013 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 measures 89" wide, compared to 1" for the Scout 210 XSF 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 or the Scout 210 XSF 2013?
The Scout 210 XSF 2013 has the bigger tank at 65 gallons, versus 32 gallons on the Scout 175 Sportfish 2009. That 33-gallon difference translates to roughly 99–165 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 and Scout 210 XSF 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Scout 175 Sportfish 2009 and the Scout 210 XSF 2013 are built by Scout. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.