The Scout 170 Costa 2009 vs Scout Boats 42 LXF 2016 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Scout Boats 42 LXF 2016 measures 42,0 feet overall (2016), giving it roughly 26,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Scout 170 Costa 2009 at 16,0 feet (2009). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Scout Boats 42 LXF 2016 tips the scales at 16 800 lbs — 16 702 lbs less than the Scout 170 Costa 2009 at 98 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 400 hp, the Scout Boats 42 LXF 2016 has a 285-hp advantage over the Scout 170 Costa 2009's 115-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 3 gal and 5 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Scout Boats 42 LXF 2016 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Scout 170 Costa 2009 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Scout Boats 42 LXF 2016 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Scout Boats 42 LXF 2016 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 42,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Scout 170 Costa 2009 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.