Scout 170 Costa 2009 boat specs
Scout
Scout 170 Costa 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Scout 225 XSF 2013 boat specs
Scout
Scout 225 XSF 2013
2013
View full specs →

Scout 170 Costa 2009 vs Scout 225 XSF 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Scout 170 Costa 2009 against a deep vee Scout 225 XSF 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Scout 225 XSF 2013 measures 22,2 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 6,2 additional feet of deck space compared to the Scout 170 Costa 2009 at 16,0 feet (2009). At 98 lbs and 22 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 250 hp, the Scout 225 XSF 2013 has a 135-hp advantage over the Scout 170 Costa 2009's 115-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 3 gal and 1 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Scout 170 Costa 2009 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Scout 225 XSF 2013 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Scout 170 Costa 2009 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Scout 170 Costa 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Scout 225 XSF 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 1 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeScout
MakeScout
Model170 Costa
Model225 XSF
Model Year2009
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 4 in
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches88
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise8℃
Deadrise20°
Draft [max] - Detail7 in
Draft [max] - Detail14 in. (0.4 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.18
Draft [max] - Meters0.36
Draft [max] - Inches7
Draft [max] - Inches14
Weight - Detail980 lbs. without engine
Weight - Detail2,200 lbs. (998 kg) without engines
Weight - kg444.52
Weight - kg997.9
Weight - lbs.98
Weight - lbs.22
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet22.17
Length - Inches9
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 2 in. (6.75 m)
Length overall - Meters5.11
Length overall - Meters6.76
Length overall - Inches201
Length overall - Inches266
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Detail8 ft. 3 in. (2.51 m)
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.51
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches99
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail100 gal. (379 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56
Fuel tank capacity - Liters378.54
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Fuel tank capacity - Gal1
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max115 hp
Engine max250 hp (187 kW)
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower150 - 200 hp (112 - 149 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum people5
Maximum people1
Headroomnot available
Headroom5 ft. 2 in. (1.57 m)
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity15 gal. (57 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail9.5 gal. (36 l)
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters37.85
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal9.5

Scout 170 Costa 2009 vs Scout 225 XSF 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Scout 170 Costa 2009 or the Scout 225 XSF 2013?
The Scout 225 XSF 2013 is the longer of the two at 22,2 feet overall. The Scout 170 Costa 2009 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 6,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Scout 170 Costa 2009 or the Scout 225 XSF 2013?
For trailering, the Scout 225 XSF 2013 has the edge at 22 lbs dry weight versus 98 lbs for the Scout 170 Costa 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Scout 225 XSF 2013 is rated to a maximum of 250 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Scout 170 Costa 2009 tops out at 115 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Scout 170 Costa 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Scout 225 XSF 2013 is certified for 1. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Scout 225 XSF 2013 measures 102" wide, compared to 88" for the Scout 170 Costa 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Scout 170 Costa 2009 and Scout 225 XSF 2013?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 3 gallons and 1 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Scout 170 Costa 2009 and Scout 225 XSF 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Scout 170 Costa 2009 and the Scout 225 XSF 2013 are built by Scout. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.