Scout 160 Standard 2007 boat specs
Scout
Scout 160 Standard 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 boat specs
Scout
Scout 262 Sportfish 2008
2008
View full specs →

Scout 160 Standard 2007 vs Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Scout 160 Standard 2007 vs Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 measures 26,0 feet overall (2008), giving it roughly 11,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Scout 160 Standard 2007 at 15,0 feet (2007). At 65 lbs and 39 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 350 hp, the Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 has a 290-hp advantage over the Scout 160 Standard 2007's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 carries 145 gallons versus 18 gallons in the Scout 160 Standard 2007. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Scout 160 Standard 2007 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 26,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Scout 160 Standard 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeScout
MakeScout
Model160 Standard
Model262 Sportfish
Model Year2007
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam6 ft. 10 in
Beam8 ft. 10 in
Beam - Meters2.08
Beam - Meters2.69
Beam - Inches82
Beam - Inches106
Deadrise12°
Deadrise20℃
Draft [max] - Detail8 in
Draft [max] - Detail15 in
Draft [max] - Meters0.2
Draft [max] - Meters0.38
Draft [max] - Inches8
Draft [max] - Inches15
Weight - Detail650 lbs
Weight - Detail3,900 lbs. (without engines)
Weight - kg294.83
Weight - kg1769.01
Weight - lbs.65
Weight - lbs.39
Length - Feet15
Length - Feet26
Length - Inches6
Length - Inches2
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Meters4.72
Length overall - Meters7.98
Length overall - Inches186
Length overall - Inches314
Body / Hull
Hull materialComposite
Hull materialComposite
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardYamaha
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail18 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail145 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters68.14
Fuel tank capacity - Liters548.88
Fuel tank capacity - Gal18
Fuel tank capacity - Gal145
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Engine maxRecommended: 60 hp Maximum: 70 hp
Engine max350 hp
Operational Info
Headnot available
HeadCompletely private with locking door
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - DetailFresh: 15 gal
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters56.78
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal15

Scout 160 Standard 2007 vs Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Scout 160 Standard 2007 or the Scout 262 Sportfish 2008?
The Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 is the longer of the two at 26,0 feet overall. The Scout 160 Standard 2007 comes in at 15,0 feet, making it roughly 11,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Scout 160 Standard 2007 or the Scout 262 Sportfish 2008?
For trailering, the Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 has the edge at 39 lbs dry weight versus 65 lbs for the Scout 160 Standard 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 is rated to a maximum of 350 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Scout 160 Standard 2007 tops out at 60 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Scout 160 Standard 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 measures 106" wide, compared to 82" for the Scout 160 Standard 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Scout 160 Standard 2007 or the Scout 262 Sportfish 2008?
The Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 has the bigger tank at 145 gallons, versus 18 gallons on the Scout 160 Standard 2007. That 127-gallon difference translates to roughly 381–635 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Scout 160 Standard 2007 and Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Scout 160 Standard 2007 and the Scout 262 Sportfish 2008 are built by Scout. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.