Scout 160 Series 2011 boat specs
Scout
Scout 160 Series 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
Scout 177 Winyah 2013 boat specs
Scout
Scout 177 Winyah 2013
2013
View full specs →

Scout 160 Series 2011 vs Scout 177 Winyah 2013: A Close Look at Two Modified-V Boats

Both the Scout 160 Series 2011 and the Scout 177 Winyah 2013 are modified-V designs, both built in fibreglass, so the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Scout 160 Series 2011 at 15,5 ft versus Scout 177 Winyah 2013 at 17,6 ft. At 940 lbs and 1 000 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class - either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Scout 177 Winyah 2013 has a 40-hp advantage over the Scout 160 Series 2011's 75-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads - 18 gal and 20 gal - so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Scout 177 Winyah 2013 comes in at 9 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Scout 160 Series 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration - meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Scout 177 Winyah 2013 at 17,6 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Scout 160 Series 2011 at 15,5 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking - a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeScout
MakeScout
Model160 Series
Model177 Winyah
Model Year2011
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam6 ft. 10 in. (2.1 m)
Beam7 ft. 3 in. (2.21 m)
Beam - Meters2.08
Beam - Meters2.21
Beam - Inches82
Beam - Inches87
Deadrise12℃
Deadrise13℃
Draft [max] - Detail8 in. (0.2 m)
Draft [max] - Detail10 in. (0.25 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.2
Draft [max] - Meters0.25
Draft [max] - Inches8
Draft [max] - Inches10
Weight - Detail940 lbs. (426 kg) without engines
Weight - Detail1,000 lbs. (454 kg) without engines
Weight - kg426.38
Weight - kg453.59
Weight - lbs.940
Weight - lbs.1000
Length - Feet15.5
Length - Feet17.58
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 6 in. (4.7 m)
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 7 in. (5.36 m)
Length overall - Meters4.72
Length overall - Meters5.36
Length overall - Inches186
Length overall - Inches211
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail18 gal. (68 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail20 gal. (76 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters68.14
Fuel tank capacity - Liters75.71
Fuel tank capacity - Gal18
Fuel tank capacity - Gal20
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower60 hp (45 kW)
Horsepowernot available
Engine max75 hp (56 kW)
Engine max115 hp (86 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum people5
Maximum people5

Scout 160 Series 2011 vs Scout 177 Winyah 2013 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Scout 160 Series 2011 or the Scout 177 Winyah 2013?
The Scout 177 Winyah 2013 is the longer of the two at 17,6 feet overall. The Scout 160 Series 2011 comes in at 15,5 feet, making it roughly 2,1 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Scout 160 Series 2011 or the Scout 177 Winyah 2013?
For trailering, the Scout 160 Series 2011 has the edge at 940 lbs dry weight versus 1 000 lbs for the Scout 177 Winyah 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Scout 177 Winyah 2013 is rated to a maximum of 115 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Scout 160 Series 2011 tops out at 75 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that - matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Scout 160 Series 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Scout 177 Winyah 2013 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing - on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Scout 177 Winyah 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 9 lbs per hp compared to 13 lbs per hp for the Scout 160 Series 2011. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane - the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Scout 177 Winyah 2013 measures 87" wide, compared to 82" for the Scout 160 Series 2011. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states - anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Scout 160 Series 2011 and Scout 177 Winyah 2013?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads - 18 gallons and 20 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Scout 160 Series 2011 and Scout 177 Winyah 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Scout 160 Series 2011 and the Scout 177 Winyah 2013 are built by Scout. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.