Robalo R260 2009 boat specs
Robalo
Robalo R260 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Robalo R265 2013 boat specs
Robalo
Robalo R265 2013
2013
View full specs →

Robalo R260 2009 vs Robalo R265 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Robalo R260 2009 against a deep vee Robalo R265 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Robalo R260 2009 at 26,0 ft versus Robalo R265 2013 at 26,1 ft. At 582 lbs and 634 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 500 hp for the Robalo R260 2009 and 500 hp for the Robalo R265 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Robalo R260 2009 carries 205 gallons versus 156 gallons in the Robalo R265 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 12 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Robalo R260 2009 and Robalo R265 2013 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeRobalo
MakeRobalo
ModelR26
ModelR265
Model Year2009
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam9 ft. (2.74 m)
Beam9 ft. (2.74 m)
Beam - Meters2.74
Beam - Meters2.74
Beam - Inches108
Beam - Inches108
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Hard Top: 8 ft. 2.5 in. (2.5 m) Without Hard Top: 6 ft. 3 in. (1.91 m)
Bridge clearance - Detail6 ft. 1 in. (1.85 m) With Hard Top: 8 ft. 7 in. (2.62 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.51
Bridge clearance - Meters2.62
Bridge clearance - Inches98.5
Bridge clearance - Inches103
Deadrise23℃
Deadrise23℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail20 in. (51 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail20 in. (51 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.51
Draft [drive up] meters0.51
Draft [drive up] inches2
Draft [drive up] inches2
Draft [max] - Detail32 in. (81 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail32 in. (81 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.81
Draft [max] - Meters0.81
Draft [max] - Inches32
Draft [max] - Inches32
Weight - Detail5,820 lbs. (2,640 kg)
Weight - Detail6,340 lbs. (2,876 kg)
Weight - kg2639.91
Weight - kg2875.77
Weight - lbs.582
Weight - lbs.634
Length - Meters8.05
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet26
Length - Feet26.08
Length - Inches5
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 5 in. (8.05 m)
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 1 in. (7.95 m)
Length overall - Meters8.05
Length overall - Meters7.95
Length overall - Inches317
Length overall - Inches313
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail205 gal. (776 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail156 gal. (591 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters776.01
Fuel tank capacity - Liters590.52
Fuel tank capacity - Gal205
Fuel tank capacity - Gal156
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Engine max500 hp (373 kW)
Engine max500 hp (373 kW)
Operational Info
Water capacity22 gal. (83 l)
Water capacity24 gal. (91 l)
Maximum people12
Maximum people12
Holding tank capacity - Detail6 gal. (23 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail10 gal. (38 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters22.71
Holding tank capacity - Liters37.85
Holding tank capacity - Gal6
Holding tank capacity - Gal1
Headroomnot available
Headroom5 ft. 8 in. (1.73 m)
Sleeping capacitynot available
Sleeping capacity2

Robalo R260 2009 vs Robalo R265 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Robalo R260 2009 or the Robalo R265 2013?
The Robalo R265 2013 is the longer of the two at 26,1 feet overall. The Robalo R260 2009 comes in at 26,0 feet, making it roughly 0,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Robalo R260 2009 or the Robalo R265 2013?
For trailering, the Robalo R260 2009 has the edge at 582 lbs dry weight versus 634 lbs for the Robalo R265 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Robalo R260 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 12 passengers, while the Robalo R265 2013 is certified for 12. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Robalo R260 2009 and Robalo R265 2013 share an 9 ft. (2.74 m) beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Robalo R260 2009 or the Robalo R265 2013?
The Robalo R260 2009 has the bigger tank at 205 gallons, versus 156 gallons on the Robalo R265 2013. That 49-gallon difference translates to roughly 147–245 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Robalo R260 2009 and Robalo R265 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Robalo R260 2009 and the Robalo R265 2013 are built by Robalo. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.