Robalo R207 2013 boat specs
Robalo
Robalo R207 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Robalo R300 2007 boat specs
Robalo
Robalo R300 2007
2007
View full specs →

Robalo R207 2013 vs Robalo R300 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Robalo R207 2013 vs Robalo R300 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Robalo R300 2007 measures 29,0 feet overall (2007), giving it roughly 8,4 additional feet of deck space compared to the Robalo R207 2013 at 20,6 feet (2013). At 34 lbs and 75 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 600 hp, the Robalo R300 2007 has a 400-hp advantage over the Robalo R207 2013's 200-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 6 gal and 3 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Robalo R300 2007 at 29,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Robalo R207 2013 at 20,6 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeRobalo
MakeRobalo
ModelR207
ModelR3
Model Year2013
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 4 in. (2.54 m)
Beam10 ft. 6 in. (3.2 m)
Beam - Meters2.54
Beam - Meters3.2
Beam - Inches1
Beam - Inches126
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 1 in. (1.55 m) With Wakeboard Tower: 8 ft. 4 in. (2.54 m)
Bridge clearance - Detail8 ft. 11 in. (2.72 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.54
Bridge clearance - Meters2.72
Bridge clearance - Inches1
Bridge clearance - Inches107
Deadrise18℃
Deadrise21℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail15 in. (38 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detailnot available
Draft [drive up] meters0.38
Draft [drive up] metersnot available
Draft [drive up] inches15
Draft [drive up] inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Detail30 in. (76 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail1 ft. 8 in. (51 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.76
Draft [max] - Meters0.51
Draft [max] - Inches3
Draft [max] - Inches2
Weight - Detail3,400 lbs. (1,542 kg)
Weight - Detail7,500 lbs. (3,402 kg) w/o engines
Weight - kg1542.21
Weight - kg3401.94
Weight - lbs.34
Weight - lbs.75
Length - Feet20.58
Length - Feet29
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 7 in. (6.27 m)
Length overall - Detail29 ft. 2 in. (8.9 m)
Length overall - Meters6.27
Length overall - Meters8.89
Length overall - Inches247
Length overall - Inches35
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters8.9
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches2
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialnot available
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail60 gal. (227 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail300 gal. (1,136 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters227.12
Fuel tank capacity - Liters1135.62
Fuel tank capacity - Gal6
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max200 hp (149 kW)
Engine max600 hp (447 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum people8 / 1,200 lbs
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity30 gal. (113 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail6 gal. (23 l)
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters22.71
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal6

Robalo R207 2013 vs Robalo R300 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Robalo R207 2013 or the Robalo R300 2007?
The Robalo R300 2007 is the longer of the two at 29,0 feet overall. The Robalo R207 2013 comes in at 20,6 feet, making it roughly 8,4 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Robalo R207 2013 or the Robalo R300 2007?
For trailering, the Robalo R207 2013 has the edge at 34 lbs dry weight versus 75 lbs for the Robalo R300 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Robalo R300 2007 is rated to a maximum of 600 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Robalo R207 2013 tops out at 200 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Robalo R207 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Robalo R300 2007 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Robalo R300 2007 measures 126" wide, compared to 1" for the Robalo R207 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Robalo R207 2013 or the Robalo R300 2007?
The Robalo R207 2013 has the bigger tank at 6 gallons, versus 3 gallons on the Robalo R300 2007. That 3-gallon difference translates to roughly 9–15 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Robalo R207 2013 and Robalo R300 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Robalo R207 2013 and the Robalo R300 2007 are built by Robalo. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.