Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012
2012
View full specs →

Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 vs Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012 — Which Deep Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 and the Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012 are deep vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012 measures 33,3 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 10,7 additional feet of deck space compared to the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 at 22,6 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012 tips the scales at 13 635 lbs — 9 500 lbs less than the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 at 4 135 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012 tops out at 300 hp. Engine specs for the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 carries 34 gallons versus 15 gallons in the Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 10 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012 at 33,3 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 at 22,6 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
ModelCaptiva 220 MTX
ModelExpress Cruiser 310 EC
Model Year2013
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam98 in. (2.49 m)
Beam10 ft. 6 in
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Meters3.2
Beam - Inches98
Beam - Inches126
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (0.56 m)
Draft [drive up] - Detail24 in
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] meters0.61
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [drive up] inches24
Weight - Detail3,520 lbs. (1,598 kg) dry 4,135 lbs. (1,877 kg) wet
Weight - Detail12,035 lbs. dry 13,635 lbs. wet
Weight - kg1875.6
Weight - kg6184.73
Weight - lbs.4135
Weight - lbs.13635
Length - Feet22.58
Length - Feet33.25
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 7 in. (6.88 m)
Length overall - Detail33 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Meters6.88
Length overall - Meters10.13
Length overall - Inches271
Length overall - Inches399
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail34 gal. (129 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail150 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters128.7
Fuel tank capacity - Liters567.81
Fuel tank capacity - Gal34
Fuel tank capacity - Gal15
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeInboard
Drive typeInboard
Engine maxnot available
Engine max300 hp
Operational Info
Maximum people10 (8)
Maximum peopleYacht certified

Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 vs Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 or the Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012?
The Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012 is the longer of the two at 33,3 feet overall. The Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 comes in at 22,6 feet, making it roughly 10,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 or the Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012?
For trailering, the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 has the edge at 4 135 lbs dry weight versus 13 635 lbs for the Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012 has a documented max rating of 300 hp. Engine specifications for the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 10 passengers, while the Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012 is certified for 10. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012 measures 126" wide, compared to 98" for the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 or the Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012?
The Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 has the bigger tank at 34 gallons, versus 15 gallons on the Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012. That 19-gallon difference translates to roughly 57–95 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 and Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 and the Rinker Express Cruiser 310 EC 2012 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.