Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012
2012
View full specs →

Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 vs Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012 — A Close Look at Two Deep Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 and the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012 are deep vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 at 19,5 ft versus Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012 at 21,1 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012 tips the scales at 3 755 lbs — 430 lbs less than the Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 at 3 325 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 200 hp for the Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 and 220 hp for the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012 carries 39 gallons versus 26 gallons in the Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 9 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012 and its 220-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 with its 200-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
ModelCaptiva 196 OB
ModelCaptiva 200 MTX
Model Year2013
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in. (2.44 m)
Beam8 ft
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches96
Draft [drive up] - Detail17 in. (0.43 m)
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in
Draft [drive up] meters0.43
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches17
Draft [drive up] inches22
Weight - Detail2,500 lbs. (1,135 kg) dry 3,325 lbs. (1,510 kg) wet
Weight - Detail3,540 lbs. dry 3,755 lbs. wet
Weight - kg1508.19
Weight - kg1703.24
Weight - lbs.3325
Weight - lbs.3755
Length - Feet19.5
Length - Feet21.08
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 6 in. (5.94 m)
Length overall - Detail21 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Meters5.94
Length overall - Meters6.43
Length overall - Inches234
Length overall - Inches253
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail26 gal. (99 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail39 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters98.42
Fuel tank capacity - Liters147.63
Fuel tank capacity - Gal26
Fuel tank capacity - Gal39
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeInboard
Engine max200 hp (149 kW)
Engine max220 hp
Operational Info
Maximum people9 (7)
Maximum people9

Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 vs Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 or the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012?
The Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012 is the longer of the two at 21,1 feet overall. The Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 comes in at 19,5 feet, making it roughly 1,6 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 or the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012?
For trailering, the Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 has the edge at 3 325 lbs dry weight versus 3 755 lbs for the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012 is rated to a maximum of 220 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 tops out at 200 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 9 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 and Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012 share an 96 in. (2.44 m) beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 or the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012?
The Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012 has the bigger tank at 39 gallons, versus 26 gallons on the Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013. That 13-gallon difference translates to roughly 39–65 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 and Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker Captiva 196 OB 2013 and the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2012 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.