Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013
2013
View full specs →

Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 vs Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 — Which Deep Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 and the Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 are deep vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 measures 29,2 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 10,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 at 18,7 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 tips the scales at 5 765 lbs — 3 090 lbs less than the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 at 2 675 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 carries a rated maximum of 150 hp. Engine data for the Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 carries 68 gallons versus 26 gallons in the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 at 29,2 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 at 18,7 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
ModelCaptiva 186 FS OB
ModelCaptiva 276 CC
Model Year2013
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam88 in. (2.26 m)
Beam109 in. (2.77 m)
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Meters2.77
Beam - Inches88
Beam - Inches109
Draft [drive up] - Detail16 in. (40 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (0.56 m)
Draft [drive up] meters0.41
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches16
Draft [drive up] inches22
Weight - Detail1,750 lbs. (795 kg) dry 2,675 lbs. (1,214 kg) wet
Weight - Detail5,765 lbs. (2,617 kg) dry 6,475 lbs. (2,940 kg) wet
Weight - kg1213.36
Weight - kg2614.96
Weight - lbs.2675
Weight - lbs.5765
Length - Feet18.67
Length - Feet29.17
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 8 in. (5.69 m)
Length overall - Detail29 ft. 2 in. (8.9 m)
Length overall - Meters5.69
Length overall - Meters8.89
Length overall - Inches224
Length overall - Inches35
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail26 gal. (99 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail68 gal. (258 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters98.42
Fuel tank capacity - Liters257.41
Fuel tank capacity - Gal26
Fuel tank capacity - Gal68
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeInboard
Engine max150 hp (112 kW)
Engine maxnot available
Operational Info
Maximum people8 (7)
Maximum peopleYacht certified

Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 vs Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 or the Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013?
The Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 is the longer of the two at 29,2 feet overall. The Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 comes in at 18,7 feet, making it roughly 10,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 or the Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013?
For trailering, the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 has the edge at 2 675 lbs dry weight versus 5 765 lbs for the Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 has a documented max rating of 150 hp. Engine specifications for the Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 measures 109" wide, compared to 88" for the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 or the Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013?
The Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 has the bigger tank at 68 gallons, versus 26 gallons on the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013. That 42-gallon difference translates to roughly 126–210 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 and Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 and the Rinker Captiva 276 CC 2013 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.