Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013
2013
View full specs →

Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 vs Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 — A Close Look at Two Deep Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 and the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 are deep vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 at 18,7 ft versus Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 at 20,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 tips the scales at 3 265 lbs — 590 lbs less than the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 at 2 675 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 carries a rated maximum of 150 hp. Engine data for the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 carries 34 gallons versus 26 gallons in the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 caps at 8. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 9 passengers and at 20,8 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 8 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
ModelCaptiva 186 FS OB
ModelCaptiva 200 MTX
Model Year2013
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam88 in. (2.26 m)
Beam96 in. (2.44 m)
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches88
Beam - Inches96
Draft [drive up] - Detail16 in. (40 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail19 in. (0.48 m)
Draft [drive up] meters0.41
Draft [drive up] meters0.48
Draft [drive up] inches16
Draft [drive up] inches19
Weight - Detail1,750 lbs. (795 kg) dry 2,675 lbs. (1,214 kg) wet
Weight - Detail2,795 lbs. (1,269 kg) dry 3,265 lbs. (1,482 kg) wet
Weight - kg1213.36
Weight - kg1480.98
Weight - lbs.2675
Weight - lbs.3265
Length - Feet18.67
Length - Feet20.83
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 8 in. (5.69 m)
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 10 in. (6.35 m)
Length overall - Meters5.69
Length overall - Meters6.35
Length overall - Inches224
Length overall - Inches25
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail26 gal. (99 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail34 gal. (129 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters98.42
Fuel tank capacity - Liters128.7
Fuel tank capacity - Gal26
Fuel tank capacity - Gal34
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeInboard
Engine max150 hp (112 kW)
Engine maxnot available
Operational Info
Maximum people8 (7)
Maximum people9 (7)

Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 vs Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 or the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013?
The Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 is the longer of the two at 20,8 feet overall. The Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 comes in at 18,7 feet, making it roughly 2,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 or the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013?
For trailering, the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 has the edge at 2 675 lbs dry weight versus 3 265 lbs for the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 has a documented max rating of 150 hp. Engine specifications for the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 measures 96" wide, compared to 88" for the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 or the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013?
The Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 has the bigger tank at 34 gallons, versus 26 gallons on the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013. That 8-gallon difference translates to roughly 24–40 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 and Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker Captiva 186 FS OB 2013 and the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2013 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.